<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 771 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334753</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating authority for further investigation to determine the eligibility of CENVAT Credit on input services. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the Appellant to provide additional corroborative evidence and allowed the appeal, keeping all issues open for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 771 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334753</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating authority for further investigation to determine the eligibility of CENVAT Credit on input services. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the Appellant to provide additional corroborative evidence and allowed the appeal, keeping all issues open for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>