<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 6 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5767</link>
    <description>Daily allowance paid to technicians deputed to work in India, though disbursed by a foreign employer, was claimed as exempt under s. 10(14) of the Income-tax Act. The SC held that the issue was governed against the Revenue by its earlier decision on comparable facts, and that the concurrent findings of the Tribunal and HC treating the daily allowance as exempt under s. 10(14) could not be displaced. The exemption claim was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 6 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5767</link>
      <description>Daily allowance paid to technicians deputed to work in India, though disbursed by a foreign employer, was claimed as exempt under s. 10(14) of the Income-tax Act. The SC held that the issue was governed against the Revenue by its earlier decision on comparable facts, and that the concurrent findings of the Tribunal and HC treating the daily allowance as exempt under s. 10(14) could not be displaced. The exemption claim was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>