https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334746 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to return the seized goods within one month as per the statutory requirement of Section 110(2) of the Customs Act. The Court emphasized that failure to issue notice under Section 124 within six months triggered the automatic return of goods, without any extension granted. The respondent was instructed to comply with the statutory provision, allowing for further action under the Customs Act if necessary based on any violations by the petitioner. en-us Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2016 15:17:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334746 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to return the seized goods within one month as per the statutory requirement of Section 110(2) of the Customs Act. The Court emphasized that failure to issue notice under Section 124 within six months triggered the automatic return of goods, without any extension granted. The respondent was instructed to comply with the statutory provision, allowing for further action under the Customs Act if necessary based on any violations by the petitioner. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334746