https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334745 The Court directed the petitioners to cooperate with the investigation by appearing daily before DRI officials, prohibited coercive actions against them, and allowed their counsel to be present during interrogation at a visible distance. The respondents were instructed to provide information on duty liability. A notice of motion was issued, emphasizing cooperation and the role of counsel. The judgment aimed to balance investigative needs with petitioners' rights, ensuring fair treatment and procedural compliance. en-us Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2016 15:17:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334745 The Court directed the petitioners to cooperate with the investigation by appearing daily before DRI officials, prohibited coercive actions against them, and allowed their counsel to be present during interrogation at a visible distance. The respondents were instructed to provide information on duty liability. A notice of motion was issued, emphasizing cooperation and the role of counsel. The judgment aimed to balance investigative needs with petitioners' rights, ensuring fair treatment and procedural compliance. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 13 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334745