<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 737 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334719</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions in allowing the deduction under section 80G and assessing the Short Term Capital Loss at the amount claimed by the appellant. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that procedural lapses in filing revised returns should not deny the assessee entitled benefits under the law. The order was pronounced on 07/09/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 12:03:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 737 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334719</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions in allowing the deduction under section 80G and assessing the Short Term Capital Loss at the amount claimed by the appellant. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that procedural lapses in filing revised returns should not deny the assessee entitled benefits under the law. The order was pronounced on 07/09/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>