<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1174 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a registered agent for filing Consolidated General Manifests, setting aside a penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 4,90,000 imposed for late filing on 490 occasions. The appellant&#039;s reasons for delay, including technical issues and holidays, were considered. The judgment emphasized the importance of manifests for duty collection and smuggling prevention under the Customs Act, 1962. Procedural requirements under Sections 30, 122A, and 124 were discussed, highlighting the need for individual consideration in penalty imposition. The decision was based on the lack of proper assessment of justifications, leading to a cumulative penalty without due process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1174 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a registered agent for filing Consolidated General Manifests, setting aside a penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 4,90,000 imposed for late filing on 490 occasions. The appellant&#039;s reasons for delay, including technical issues and holidays, were considered. The judgment emphasized the importance of manifests for duty collection and smuggling prevention under the Customs Act, 1962. Procedural requirements under Sections 30, 122A, and 124 were discussed, highlighting the need for individual consideration in penalty imposition. The decision was based on the lack of proper assessment of justifications, leading to a cumulative penalty without due process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>