<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 664 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188139</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision that the appellant company was liable to pay service tax as a &quot;Consulting Engineer&quot; under Section 65 of the Finance Act, including companies within the definition. The exemption notification from 28-2-1999 was not applied retrospectively. Penalties imposed on the appellant were upheld due to deliberate non-compliance with tax laws. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court&#039;s rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:28:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 664 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188139</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision that the appellant company was liable to pay service tax as a &quot;Consulting Engineer&quot; under Section 65 of the Finance Act, including companies within the definition. The exemption notification from 28-2-1999 was not applied retrospectively. Penalties imposed on the appellant were upheld due to deliberate non-compliance with tax laws. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court&#039;s rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>