<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1292 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of Rs. 42,22,857/- under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the deletion of the disallowance. The Tribunal stressed the importance of the Assessing Officer properly establishing the need for invoking Section 14A and Rule 8D before making such disallowances. The decision was rendered on 05/05/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:41:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1292 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of Rs. 42,22,857/- under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the deletion of the disallowance. The Tribunal stressed the importance of the Assessing Officer properly establishing the need for invoking Section 14A and Rule 8D before making such disallowances. The decision was rendered on 05/05/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>