<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 942 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188118</link>
    <description>Service rules permitting recovery of pecuniary loss caused by employee negligence can support proceedings initiated before superannuation, and those proceedings may continue after retirement for adjustment against retiral benefits. Where a show cause notice and charge-sheet were issued while the employee was still in service, retirement does not by itself extinguish the employer&#039;s right to recover the loss from gratuity or other terminal dues. The High Court should not interfere in writ jurisdiction when the action is not shown to be without authority or jurisdiction. Accordingly, recovery proceedings and consequential orders were treated as legally sustainable notwithstanding superannuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:41:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 942 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188118</link>
      <description>Service rules permitting recovery of pecuniary loss caused by employee negligence can support proceedings initiated before superannuation, and those proceedings may continue after retirement for adjustment against retiral benefits. Where a show cause notice and charge-sheet were issued while the employee was still in service, retirement does not by itself extinguish the employer&#039;s right to recover the loss from gratuity or other terminal dues. The High Court should not interfere in writ jurisdiction when the action is not shown to be without authority or jurisdiction. Accordingly, recovery proceedings and consequential orders were treated as legally sustainable notwithstanding superannuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>