<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1423 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the denial of set off of loss on account of forfeiture of license fee. The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to set off the forfeited amount based on the cancellation of the license and subsequent forfeiture of fees, in line with the Madras High Court judgment. The Tribunal found no legal question arising and upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer, ultimately affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the set off.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1423 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the denial of set off of loss on account of forfeiture of license fee. The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to set off the forfeited amount based on the cancellation of the license and subsequent forfeiture of fees, in line with the Madras High Court judgment. The Tribunal found no legal question arising and upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer, ultimately affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the set off.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>