https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188114 Preventive detention is constitutionally defective where the detaining authority relies on adverse material and background particulars that are not communicated to the detenu, because the omission denies an effective representation under Article 22(5). The safeguard requires disclosure of all material particulars forming part of the subjective satisfaction, unless the non-disclosure is justified within the constitutional exception under Article 22(6). Where the communicated grounds are incomplete or vague for want of such disclosure, the detention cannot stand and is vitiated for breach of the right to make a meaningful representation. en-us Fri, 01 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:27:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188114 Preventive detention is constitutionally defective where the detaining authority relies on adverse material and background particulars that are not communicated to the detenu, because the omission denies an effective representation under Article 22(5). The safeguard requires disclosure of all material particulars forming part of the subjective satisfaction, unless the non-disclosure is justified within the constitutional exception under Article 22(6). Where the communicated grounds are incomplete or vague for want of such disclosure, the detention cannot stand and is vitiated for breach of the right to make a meaningful representation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188114