<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 687 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188112</link>
    <description>Although criminal proceedings disclosed a cognizable offence and had reached the stage of charge and trial, the Supreme Court held that the peculiar factual background, long-standing disputes, allegations of mala fides, and the interests of complete justice justified intervention under Article 142. The Court noted the usual restraint under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in quashing FIRs and investigations, but found that continuation of the litigation would amount to abuse of process. The criminal proceedings arising from both FIRs, together with the charges founded on them, were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2023 20:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 687 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188112</link>
      <description>Although criminal proceedings disclosed a cognizable offence and had reached the stage of charge and trial, the Supreme Court held that the peculiar factual background, long-standing disputes, allegations of mala fides, and the interests of complete justice justified intervention under Article 142. The Court noted the usual restraint under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in quashing FIRs and investigations, but found that continuation of the litigation would amount to abuse of process. The criminal proceedings arising from both FIRs, together with the charges founded on them, were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>