<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 713 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334695</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to confirm the addition of Rs. 4,20,824 as commodity loss. The appellant, a stockbroker, failed to provide concrete evidence during assessment proceedings to prove the genuineness of the transactions, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Despite requests to summon relevant persons, no action was taken, and the Tribunal determined the commodity transaction was not genuine. The appellant&#039;s inability to produce material and evidence supported the decision to maintain the addition, with the Court finding no substantial question of law to challenge the authorities&#039; findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 713 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334695</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to confirm the addition of Rs. 4,20,824 as commodity loss. The appellant, a stockbroker, failed to provide concrete evidence during assessment proceedings to prove the genuineness of the transactions, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Despite requests to summon relevant persons, no action was taken, and the Tribunal determined the commodity transaction was not genuine. The appellant&#039;s inability to produce material and evidence supported the decision to maintain the addition, with the Court finding no substantial question of law to challenge the authorities&#039; findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>