https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188107 The HC allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice dated September 11, 2013, issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Range-II, Lucknow, due to lack of jurisdiction. The court found procedural non-compliance under section 124 of the Income-tax Act, rendering the entire proceedings and demand ab initio illegal. The court underscored the necessity of adhering to statutory procedures and jurisdictional boundaries. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188107 The HC allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice dated September 11, 2013, issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Range-II, Lucknow, due to lack of jurisdiction. The court found procedural non-compliance under section 124 of the Income-tax Act, rendering the entire proceedings and demand ab initio illegal. The court underscored the necessity of adhering to statutory procedures and jurisdictional boundaries. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188107