<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 702 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were not liable for service tax on GTA services for transportation from the Nepal border to their factory premises. The Tribunal emphasized that the transportation expenses were billed by the Nepalese suppliers, who engaged the transporters, and the appellants reimbursed them as part of the goods&#039; supply contract. As there was no agency relationship for transportation between the appellants and the suppliers, the appellants were not considered recipients of GTA services. The Tribunal&#039;s decision in similar cases was followed, leading to the appeal&#039;s allowance and setting aside of the previous order with consequential relief for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 702 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were not liable for service tax on GTA services for transportation from the Nepal border to their factory premises. The Tribunal emphasized that the transportation expenses were billed by the Nepalese suppliers, who engaged the transporters, and the appellants reimbursed them as part of the goods&#039; supply contract. As there was no agency relationship for transportation between the appellants and the suppliers, the appellants were not considered recipients of GTA services. The Tribunal&#039;s decision in similar cases was followed, leading to the appeal&#039;s allowance and setting aside of the previous order with consequential relief for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>