<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 697 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the original authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellants, allowing duty payment through cenvat credit during default periods. The Tribunal emphasized the legality of utilizing cenvat credit for duty payment, citing relevant case laws and Supreme Court precedent. It rejected the imposition of additional penalty under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and set aside the duty demand, finding no merit in the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 697 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the original authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellants, allowing duty payment through cenvat credit during default periods. The Tribunal emphasized the legality of utilizing cenvat credit for duty payment, citing relevant case laws and Supreme Court precedent. It rejected the imposition of additional penalty under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and set aside the duty demand, finding no merit in the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>