<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 696 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334678</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the order denying exemption to the appellants in Unit No.III under Notification No. 50/2003-CE. The denial was based on the failure to file a specific declaration as required by the notification. The tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s actions constituted substantial compliance with the notification&#039;s conditions, as they had adequately informed the department about their manufacturing activities and the exemption claimed. Since there were no other valid grounds for denial, the exemption denial was deemed unjustified, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 696 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334678</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the order denying exemption to the appellants in Unit No.III under Notification No. 50/2003-CE. The denial was based on the failure to file a specific declaration as required by the notification. The tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s actions constituted substantial compliance with the notification&#039;s conditions, as they had adequately informed the department about their manufacturing activities and the exemption claimed. Since there were no other valid grounds for denial, the exemption denial was deemed unjustified, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>