https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334675 The appeal was resolved in favor of the appellant, granting the refund claim based on the findings related to unjust enrichment. The Member (Judicial) concluded that the appellant had not recovered the reversed amount from buyers, as evidenced by issued debit notes, meeting the unjust enrichment requirement. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was deemed entitled to the refund claim as determined by the adjudicating authority in the present case. en-us Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334675 The appeal was resolved in favor of the appellant, granting the refund claim based on the findings related to unjust enrichment. The Member (Judicial) concluded that the appellant had not recovered the reversed amount from buyers, as evidenced by issued debit notes, meeting the unjust enrichment requirement. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was deemed entitled to the refund claim as determined by the adjudicating authority in the present case. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334675