<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 691 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334673</link>
    <description>Goods manufactured through kneading, moulding, drying and firing of clay were treated as building bricks rather than ceramic tiles, because the process and surrounding facts showed a construction-brick product. A prior final finding had already classified the goods under heading 69.04 and recognised exemption under Notification No. 05/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006. On that basis, the exemption was applied and the duty demand was found unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:30:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 691 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334673</link>
      <description>Goods manufactured through kneading, moulding, drying and firing of clay were treated as building bricks rather than ceramic tiles, because the process and surrounding facts showed a construction-brick product. A prior final finding had already classified the goods under heading 69.04 and recognised exemption under Notification No. 05/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006. On that basis, the exemption was applied and the duty demand was found unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>