https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334664 The Court found that the response to the petitioner's request under the Right to Information Act was insufficient and failed to address the information sought adequately. The disposal of the complaint without proper consideration and the lack of detailed response caused gross injustice to the petitioner. The State Information Commissioner's failure to apply her mind to the case led to the impugned order being set aside. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for a comprehensive re-examination to address the petitioner's grievance effectively within a specified timeline. en-us Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334664 The Court found that the response to the petitioner's request under the Right to Information Act was insufficient and failed to address the information sought adequately. The disposal of the complaint without proper consideration and the lack of detailed response caused gross injustice to the petitioner. The State Information Commissioner's failure to apply her mind to the case led to the impugned order being set aside. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for a comprehensive re-examination to address the petitioner's grievance effectively within a specified timeline. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334664