<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 677 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Original Authority to reexamine the refund claims in line with the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision. The Tribunal emphasized aligning refund claim timelines with the accrual of the right to claim a refund, allowing claims within the longer of the two specified periods. The decision underscored the significance of judicial interpretations in clarifying the legal position on limitation periods for refund claims, ensuring legitimate refunds are not denied based on strict timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 677 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Original Authority to reexamine the refund claims in line with the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision. The Tribunal emphasized aligning refund claim timelines with the accrual of the right to claim a refund, allowing claims within the longer of the two specified periods. The decision underscored the significance of judicial interpretations in clarifying the legal position on limitation periods for refund claims, ensuring legitimate refunds are not denied based on strict timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>