<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 672 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334654</link>
    <description>Reversal of input tax credit in a CST assessment could not be sustained where the pre-revision notice did not clearly state the statutory basis for the proposed action and the dealer was not given a proper opportunity to object and be heard. Although section 9(2) of the CST Act permits use of State machinery for assessment and collection, the credit reversal had to be carried out under the Tamil Nadu VAT regime, with clear notice of the proposed reversal and the consequential tax treatment. The assessment was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after inviting objections, granting personal hearing, and verifying the records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:55:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 672 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334654</link>
      <description>Reversal of input tax credit in a CST assessment could not be sustained where the pre-revision notice did not clearly state the statutory basis for the proposed action and the dealer was not given a proper opportunity to object and be heard. Although section 9(2) of the CST Act permits use of State machinery for assessment and collection, the credit reversal had to be carried out under the Tamil Nadu VAT regime, with clear notice of the proposed reversal and the consequential tax treatment. The assessment was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after inviting objections, granting personal hearing, and verifying the records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>