https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188091 The Member (J) overturned the denial of Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 50,375 to the appellant for the period of January 2012 to February 2013. Despite the alleged lack of maintained sale return records, the appellant's submission of relevant records during adjudication was deemed adequate to support the credit claim. Emphasizing compliance with Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, the Member (J) concluded that the denial of credit was unjustified. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief, highlighting the importance of maintaining proper records for Cenvat credit claims. en-us Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:44:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188091 The Member (J) overturned the denial of Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 50,375 to the appellant for the period of January 2012 to February 2013. Despite the alleged lack of maintained sale return records, the appellant's submission of relevant records during adjudication was deemed adequate to support the credit claim. Emphasizing compliance with Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, the Member (J) concluded that the denial of credit was unjustified. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief, highlighting the importance of maintaining proper records for Cenvat credit claims. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188091