<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1169 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188097</link>
    <description>Income from slot chartering was treated as falling within income from the operations of ships under Article 8 of the India-Singapore DTAA, following an earlier Bombay High Court decision on the same point. As the issue had already been concluded by that precedent, no substantial question of law survived for consideration. The question was therefore answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:44:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1169 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188097</link>
      <description>Income from slot chartering was treated as falling within income from the operations of ships under Article 8 of the India-Singapore DTAA, following an earlier Bombay High Court decision on the same point. As the issue had already been concluded by that precedent, no substantial question of law survived for consideration. The question was therefore answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>