<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (1) TMI 73 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188082</link>
    <description>The court found the detention orders against the petitioners illegal and ultra vires due to the State Government&#039;s failure to consider their representations before forwarding them to the Advisory Board. Non-compliance with procedural safeguards under Article 22(5) rendered the orders invalid. As a result, the petitioners, including Sk. Abdul Karim, Nirmal Chandra Jana, Sk. Ibrahim, and Nur Mohd., were entitled to be released, and the petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:27:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (1) TMI 73 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188082</link>
      <description>The court found the detention orders against the petitioners illegal and ultra vires due to the State Government&#039;s failure to consider their representations before forwarding them to the Advisory Board. Non-compliance with procedural safeguards under Article 22(5) rendered the orders invalid. As a result, the petitioners, including Sk. Abdul Karim, Nirmal Chandra Jana, Sk. Ibrahim, and Nur Mohd., were entitled to be released, and the petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>