https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188081 The court dismissed the civil appeal, affirming the Division Bench's decision to overturn the Single Judge's decree. It concluded that the resolutions by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) did not establish a binding legal right for the plaintiffs to acquire tenements. The court held that the doctrine of promissory estoppel was inapplicable, as DTC's decision to rescind the resolutions was justified by overriding public interest considerations, including financial constraints and the need to house in-service employees. Consequently, the plaintiffs' claims were insufficient to mandate the transfer of tenements. en-us Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Feb 2024 16:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188081 The court dismissed the civil appeal, affirming the Division Bench's decision to overturn the Single Judge's decree. It concluded that the resolutions by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) did not establish a binding legal right for the plaintiffs to acquire tenements. The court held that the doctrine of promissory estoppel was inapplicable, as DTC's decision to rescind the resolutions was justified by overriding public interest considerations, including financial constraints and the need to house in-service employees. Consequently, the plaintiffs' claims were insufficient to mandate the transfer of tenements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188081