<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 668 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334650</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to disallow the provision for commission payable as a deductible expense due to non-compliance with TDS requirements under section 40a(ia) and the unascertainable nature of the liability. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the ruling that the provision did not represent an ascertained mercantile liability and therefore could not be allowed without corresponding TDS payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:35:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 668 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334650</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to disallow the provision for commission payable as a deductible expense due to non-compliance with TDS requirements under section 40a(ia) and the unascertainable nature of the liability. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the ruling that the provision did not represent an ascertained mercantile liability and therefore could not be allowed without corresponding TDS payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>