<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5742</link>
    <description>SC held that section 10(29) exempts only income directly derived from letting godowns/warehouses for storage, processing or facilitating marketing of commodities. Income from other purposes or sources, including interest on fixed deposits, does not fall within the exemption and cannot be treated as an incidental part of the exempt activity. The Court affirmed the restrictive, plain-language construction of the provision and rejected the integrated-activity argument. Appeals dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5742</link>
      <description>SC held that section 10(29) exempts only income directly derived from letting godowns/warehouses for storage, processing or facilitating marketing of commodities. Income from other purposes or sources, including interest on fixed deposits, does not fall within the exemption and cannot be treated as an incidental part of the exempt activity. The Court affirmed the restrictive, plain-language construction of the provision and rejected the integrated-activity argument. Appeals dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>