<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 661 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334643</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the additions related to inter-bank deposits and deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Act. However, the additions for opening cash balance and small loans were upheld due to the inability to prove the sources and creditworthiness of the depositors. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the evidence provided, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:25:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 661 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334643</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the additions related to inter-bank deposits and deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Act. However, the additions for opening cash balance and small loans were upheld due to the inability to prove the sources and creditworthiness of the depositors. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the evidence provided, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>