https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334642 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions. Payments to M/s. Geo Acquatic were considered reimbursements, not subject to TDS. Clearing and forwarding charges to M/s. Al Mustafa Agencies were non-TDS as they were for statutory authorities and laborers. Interest on vehicle loan to M/s. Sundaram Finance was not TDS applicable as part of EMI payments. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:25:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334642 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions. Payments to M/s. Geo Acquatic were considered reimbursements, not subject to TDS. Clearing and forwarding charges to M/s. Al Mustafa Agencies were non-TDS as they were for statutory authorities and laborers. Interest on vehicle loan to M/s. Sundaram Finance was not TDS applicable as part of EMI payments. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334642