<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 653 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334635</link>
    <description>Higher depreciation at 30% is available for vehicles used in the business of transporting goods on hire, even where they are not separately hired out to another person. The assessee&#039;s pay loaders, dozers and water tankers were deployed under a transport arrangement for loading, transporting and allied work in coal and iron ore operations, which gave the activity an element of hire. CBDT Circular No. 652 was read as extending the Appendix I entry to such use, and prior decisions on dumpers and pay loaders used for transporting others&#039; goods supported that construction. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected and the higher depreciation claim was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 653 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334635</link>
      <description>Higher depreciation at 30% is available for vehicles used in the business of transporting goods on hire, even where they are not separately hired out to another person. The assessee&#039;s pay loaders, dozers and water tankers were deployed under a transport arrangement for loading, transporting and allied work in coal and iron ore operations, which gave the activity an element of hire. CBDT Circular No. 652 was read as extending the Appendix I entry to such use, and prior decisions on dumpers and pay loaders used for transporting others&#039; goods supported that construction. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected and the higher depreciation claim was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>