<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 648 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the Order-in-Original, remanding the case back to the Commissioner for a fresh decision. The Commissioner&#039;s failure to properly consider evidence due to time constraints was noted, leading to the decision for reevaluation. Both parties were granted the opportunity to present their arguments, with all issues kept open for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:18:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 648 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the Order-in-Original, remanding the case back to the Commissioner for a fresh decision. The Commissioner&#039;s failure to properly consider evidence due to time constraints was noted, leading to the decision for reevaluation. Both parties were granted the opportunity to present their arguments, with all issues kept open for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>