<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 639 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the photo albums under Chapter Heading 39.26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, confirmed the demand for the period within limitation, directed the appellant to pay the duty along with interest, and set aside the penalties imposed due to the absence of any malafide intention. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 639 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the photo albums under Chapter Heading 39.26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, confirmed the demand for the period within limitation, directed the appellant to pay the duty along with interest, and set aside the penalties imposed due to the absence of any malafide intention. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>