<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 638 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334620</link>
    <description>MODVAT credit on bitumen drums could not be denied merely because the declaration under Rule 57G described the item in the final-product column instead of the input column. The record showed actual receipt and use of the drums in relation to manufacture and packing, and the revenue did not dispute those substantive facts. The declaration error was only a mistaken description, so the procedural defect could not defeat credit where eligibility conditions were otherwise satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:59:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 638 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334620</link>
      <description>MODVAT credit on bitumen drums could not be denied merely because the declaration under Rule 57G described the item in the final-product column instead of the input column. The record showed actual receipt and use of the drums in relation to manufacture and packing, and the revenue did not dispute those substantive facts. The declaration error was only a mistaken description, so the procedural defect could not defeat credit where eligibility conditions were otherwise satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>