https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334614 Duty on clinker captively consumed in the manufacture of exempt cement was held not payable, because the issue was covered by the assessee's own case before the Supreme Court, which had ruled that such captive clinker is not liable to duty when used to produce exempt final cement. Applying that binding principle, the Tribunal held that the exemption benefit was available and the demand could not be sustained, with the impugned order set aside in favour of the assessee. en-us Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:35:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334614 Duty on clinker captively consumed in the manufacture of exempt cement was held not payable, because the issue was covered by the assessee's own case before the Supreme Court, which had ruled that such captive clinker is not liable to duty when used to produce exempt final cement. Applying that binding principle, the Tribunal held that the exemption benefit was available and the demand could not be sustained, with the impugned order set aside in favour of the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334614