<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 687 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188073</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld a duty demand of Rs. 35,62,704 on finished fabrics and confirmed the confiscation of processed fabrics due to alleged clandestine clearance. A penalty equal to the duty amount was imposed on the appellants, with the Tribunal reducing it to Rs. 8,00,000. Despite the appellants partially paying duty, the retraction of a coercion claim by the proprietor was dismissed. The judgment highlighted the importance of credibility of evidence, retraction of statements, and unlawful clearance of goods in determining the case outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:18:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 687 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188073</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld a duty demand of Rs. 35,62,704 on finished fabrics and confirmed the confiscation of processed fabrics due to alleged clandestine clearance. A penalty equal to the duty amount was imposed on the appellants, with the Tribunal reducing it to Rs. 8,00,000. Despite the appellants partially paying duty, the retraction of a coercion claim by the proprietor was dismissed. The judgment highlighted the importance of credibility of evidence, retraction of statements, and unlawful clearance of goods in determining the case outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>