https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188063 The appeal was filed against the imposition of a penalty under Rule 25 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Commissioner (Appeals) noted that no duty was demanded, and there was no evidence of mala fide intention. The allegations in the show cause notice were considered technical, and the penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced. As there was no requirement for penalty imposition based on the findings, the impugned order imposing the penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:15:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188063 The appeal was filed against the imposition of a penalty under Rule 25 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Commissioner (Appeals) noted that no duty was demanded, and there was no evidence of mala fide intention. The allegations in the show cause notice were considered technical, and the penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced. As there was no requirement for penalty imposition based on the findings, the impugned order imposing the penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188063