https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188070 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in the Writ Petition seeking the return of seized cheques by Enforcement Wing Officers. Emphasizing that the Officers lacked authority to collect cheques as advance tax payments, the Court ordered respondents 1 to 3 to return specific cheques to the petitioner within a week, prohibiting encashment during this period. Noting that one cheque was already encashed, the judgment did not impose costs on the respondents and concluded the matter. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:15:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188070 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in the Writ Petition seeking the return of seized cheques by Enforcement Wing Officers. Emphasizing that the Officers lacked authority to collect cheques as advance tax payments, the Court ordered respondents 1 to 3 to return specific cheques to the petitioner within a week, prohibiting encashment during this period. Noting that one cheque was already encashed, the judgment did not impose costs on the respondents and concluded the matter. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188070