<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1929 (8) TMI 8 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188071</link>
    <description>A lump sum received on waiver of forfeiture and rearrangement of leasehold rights was treated as a capital receipt, not assessable income under section 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1922. The receipt arose from a re-settlement of the lease and reflected the immediate realisation of enhanced value in the capital asset, not income from a trading or revenue source. As the assessees were not shown to be carrying on a business in house property, the amount was held to be outside the charge to tax and in favour of the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:15:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1929 (8) TMI 8 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188071</link>
      <description>A lump sum received on waiver of forfeiture and rearrangement of leasehold rights was treated as a capital receipt, not assessable income under section 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1922. The receipt arose from a re-settlement of the lease and reflected the immediate realisation of enhanced value in the capital asset, not income from a trading or revenue source. As the assessees were not shown to be carrying on a business in house property, the amount was held to be outside the charge to tax and in favour of the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>