<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 623 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334605</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Writ Petitions, setting aside the impugned order and directing the processing of the refund claim in accordance with the 2009 Policy. The Court held that the decision of the Delhi High Court bound the respondents, leading to the allowance of the Writ Petition and the quashing of the impugned order. Consequently, there was no need to further examine the correctness of Policy Circular No. 16 dated 15.03.2013, resulting in the closure of the related Writ Petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 623 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334605</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Writ Petitions, setting aside the impugned order and directing the processing of the refund claim in accordance with the 2009 Policy. The Court held that the decision of the Delhi High Court bound the respondents, leading to the allowance of the Writ Petition and the quashing of the impugned order. Consequently, there was no need to further examine the correctness of Policy Circular No. 16 dated 15.03.2013, resulting in the closure of the related Writ Petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>