<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 620 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334602</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed an appeal against a learned single judge&#039;s order directing an enquiry in a case involving serious allegations against the Addl. Commissioner of Customs. The Court directed the Chief Commissioner of Customs to assign the enquiry to another officer of the same rank to ensure fairness and prevent prejudice. The designated officer was to independently assess the matter without influence, with both parties required to cooperate. The appeal was disposed of, with the Chief Commissioner instructed to nominate the officer within two weeks and modify the original order accordingly. Compliance with the directives was mandated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 620 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334602</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed an appeal against a learned single judge&#039;s order directing an enquiry in a case involving serious allegations against the Addl. Commissioner of Customs. The Court directed the Chief Commissioner of Customs to assign the enquiry to another officer of the same rank to ensure fairness and prevent prejudice. The designated officer was to independently assess the matter without influence, with both parties required to cooperate. The appeal was disposed of, with the Chief Commissioner instructed to nominate the officer within two weeks and modify the original order accordingly. Compliance with the directives was mandated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>