<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 618 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334600</link>
    <description>The court set aside the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s claim under the Incremental Exports Incentivisation Scheme (IEIS) due to the respondents&#039; failure to consider the submitted documents properly. The court directed a reevaluation of the documents, adherence to scheme guidelines, and a prompt decision within two months. The petition was disposed of, emphasizing a fair and expeditious review process for the petitioner&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 618 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334600</link>
      <description>The court set aside the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s claim under the Incremental Exports Incentivisation Scheme (IEIS) due to the respondents&#039; failure to consider the submitted documents properly. The court directed a reevaluation of the documents, adherence to scheme guidelines, and a prompt decision within two months. The petition was disposed of, emphasizing a fair and expeditious review process for the petitioner&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>