<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 617 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334599</link>
    <description>The Court directed the release of seized consignments upon compliance with specified conditions, clarifying that the release did not hinder adjudication proceedings. The Respondent&#039;s fraud allegations regarding illegal export activities were considered in justifying the provisional order. The Court emphasized the need for prompt adjudication proceedings to address the alleged fraud, allowing for the unlocking of the IEC number upon compliance with conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:19:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 617 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334599</link>
      <description>The Court directed the release of seized consignments upon compliance with specified conditions, clarifying that the release did not hinder adjudication proceedings. The Respondent&#039;s fraud allegations regarding illegal export activities were considered in justifying the provisional order. The Court emphasized the need for prompt adjudication proceedings to address the alleged fraud, allowing for the unlocking of the IEC number upon compliance with conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>