<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 607 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334589</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, ruling that interest on borrowed funds for declaring dividends is deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the dividends were paid from adequate internal resources, supporting the deduction as a business expense. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that interest on borrowings for dividend declaration qualifies as a deductible expense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:06:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 607 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334589</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, ruling that interest on borrowed funds for declaring dividends is deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the dividends were paid from adequate internal resources, supporting the deduction as a business expense. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that interest on borrowings for dividend declaration qualifies as a deductible expense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>