https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188059 The Court dismissed the central excise appeal challenging the order under Section 35G, citing no substantial question of law. The appellant's arguments for full waiver based on breach of natural justice and undue hardship were rejected, emphasizing the importance of consistency in CESTAT decisions. The Court referenced relevant case laws to support its decision, underscoring the significance of adherence to principles of natural justice and the interpretation of "undue hardship" for grant of waivers under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. en-us Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:17:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188059 The Court dismissed the central excise appeal challenging the order under Section 35G, citing no substantial question of law. The appellant's arguments for full waiver based on breach of natural justice and undue hardship were rejected, emphasizing the importance of consistency in CESTAT decisions. The Court referenced relevant case laws to support its decision, underscoring the significance of adherence to principles of natural justice and the interpretation of "undue hardship" for grant of waivers under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188059