<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5728</link>
    <description>Section 36(1)(iv) permits deduction of sums paid by an employer as contribution to a recognised provident fund or approved superannuation fund, subject to prescribed limits and CBDT-specified conditions only where contributions are not annual fixed contributions or not fixed on a definite basis. The SC held that the impugned &quot;initial contribution&quot; was not a payment made for obtaining recognition/approval and thus fell outside the limit-setting power contemplated under s. 36(1)(iv). Relying substantially on the approach adopted by an HC on the scope of CBDT conditions (without deciding whether actual payment could be mandated), the SC upheld allowability of the entire initial contribution and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 20:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5728</link>
      <description>Section 36(1)(iv) permits deduction of sums paid by an employer as contribution to a recognised provident fund or approved superannuation fund, subject to prescribed limits and CBDT-specified conditions only where contributions are not annual fixed contributions or not fixed on a definite basis. The SC held that the impugned &quot;initial contribution&quot; was not a payment made for obtaining recognition/approval and thus fell outside the limit-setting power contemplated under s. 36(1)(iv). Relying substantially on the approach adopted by an HC on the scope of CBDT conditions (without deciding whether actual payment could be mandated), the SC upheld allowability of the entire initial contribution and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>