<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 578 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334560</link>
    <description>Deemed export turnover from clearances between two 100% EOUs was treated at par with physical exports for refund under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The disputed services, including legal consultancy and erection, commissioning and installation, were recognised as input services, while management, maintenance and repair and project management consultancy required supporting documents for business nexus verification and fresh quantification. The refund dispute was therefore allowed in part and remanded for reconsideration with permission to furnish records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 578 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334560</link>
      <description>Deemed export turnover from clearances between two 100% EOUs was treated at par with physical exports for refund under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The disputed services, including legal consultancy and erection, commissioning and installation, were recognised as input services, while management, maintenance and repair and project management consultancy required supporting documents for business nexus verification and fresh quantification. The refund dispute was therefore allowed in part and remanded for reconsideration with permission to furnish records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>