<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 577 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334559</link>
    <description>Parts and accessories manufactured in a workshop adjacent to a mine were treated as eligible for exemption when they were used exclusively for mining machines of the same company and formed part of the mining operations. The interpretation of &quot;mine&quot; under the Mines Act, 1952 was read with a purposive construction of the exemption notification, and the term &quot;precincts&quot; was given a wider meaning than a strict literal approach. On that basis, a workshop in the environs of a mine, under the same management and serving mine-related purposes, could fall within the exemption, and the duty demand was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 577 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334559</link>
      <description>Parts and accessories manufactured in a workshop adjacent to a mine were treated as eligible for exemption when they were used exclusively for mining machines of the same company and formed part of the mining operations. The interpretation of &quot;mine&quot; under the Mines Act, 1952 was read with a purposive construction of the exemption notification, and the term &quot;precincts&quot; was given a wider meaning than a strict literal approach. On that basis, a workshop in the environs of a mine, under the same management and serving mine-related purposes, could fall within the exemption, and the duty demand was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>