<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 573 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Appellants were not eligible for CENVAT Credit on services used in constructing residential flats, aligning with judgments of the Gujarat High Court. The penalty imposed under Rule 15(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 was deemed unjustified and set aside as the credit was availed in good faith. The appeal was partly allowed, specifically concerning the penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 573 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Appellants were not eligible for CENVAT Credit on services used in constructing residential flats, aligning with judgments of the Gujarat High Court. The penalty imposed under Rule 15(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 was deemed unjustified and set aside as the credit was availed in good faith. The appeal was partly allowed, specifically concerning the penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>