<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 790 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188057</link>
    <description>The text explains that a court cannot, without pleadings or notice to affected parties, issue sweeping directions confining appointments to one statutory eligibility category or extend that restriction to other tribunals. It also states that Section 6 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 provides multiple qualifying classes for appointment as Vice-Chairman, including categories reflecting administrative service experience, consistent with the Tribunal scheme approved in earlier constitutional decisions. The statutory framework recognises a mix of judicial and administrative expertise, and a court cannot neutralise the remaining categories by direction without striking down the provision. The resulting appeal restored the statutory eligibility framework and left the unresolved dispute to be decided on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 790 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188057</link>
      <description>The text explains that a court cannot, without pleadings or notice to affected parties, issue sweeping directions confining appointments to one statutory eligibility category or extend that restriction to other tribunals. It also states that Section 6 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 provides multiple qualifying classes for appointment as Vice-Chairman, including categories reflecting administrative service experience, consistent with the Tribunal scheme approved in earlier constitutional decisions. The statutory framework recognises a mix of judicial and administrative expertise, and a court cannot neutralise the remaining categories by direction without striking down the provision. The resulting appeal restored the statutory eligibility framework and left the unresolved dispute to be decided on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>